I have had a number of photographers and fellow professionals ask me what its like to shoot a wedding using my Leica M9. Most seem surprised at the fact I shoot a majority of the day using my M9. I have been shooting weddings this way for two years and I am really pleased with the results, there are certainly a few small pit falls using the M9 though, here are the pros and cons:
Pros – Discrete to use, quiet, amazing sharpness and clarity, huge file sizes when using uncompressed RAW (110 mg Tiffs) some would see this as a negative but if you want to print big then its a good thing, you can also crop and still get amazing results.
Cons – Buffer slow to clear, LCD screen not the clearest and marks easily, you need to be comfortable with using a rangefinder, with practise its quick to use and so much more accurate than AF, ISO not so good after 1600.
I still use a Nikon D700 alongside my M9 as sometimes I need a longer lens, the M system tops out at 135mm. You learn to shoot differently with the Leica, as its light to hold you have it with you all the time ready for the next shot, with the Nikon you put it down or in your bag. I have used dozens of different cameras over the years to shoot my weddings with, I have listed them below with a brief rating.
Leica M9 – Perfect for me, light, quick and so so good! 9.5/10
Nikon D700 – Very good at high ISO’s sharp Nikon lenses, 7/10
Pentax 645D – Camera good , slow to use, poor viewfinder, lenses average, too many gimmicks, too heavy, 5/10
Hasselblad HD3II – Pretty quick to use, fast focusing, nice viewfinder, way too heavy, battery hopeless lasts an hour, 5/10
Nikon D3 – HEAVY! solid, fantastic at high ISO’s, do you need 10 frames per second? 6/10
Mamiya ZD – NICE! very slow buffer, like 2 mins to clear with a fast card! Dam good files, not too heavy, huge sensor means smooth sharp files, 7/10
Nikon D7000 – Great second camera, small, light, slow buffer, very nice files, sharp, pretty cheap at around £800! 8/10
Canon 5D mk1 – Landmark wedding camera, light, robust, great files, large and sharp, great viewfinder, fast to use, battery goes on all day long, hard to fault really – 8.5/10
Canon 1DS mk2 – Way too heavy! great files, very fast to use, no advantage over the 5D mk1 though – 6/10
Canon 1D mk2 – Not a wedding camera! its a sports/press camera, unless you want to reel off 11 fPS? why? Too heavy – 5/10
Canon 5D mk2 – Take the perfect wedding camera (5D mk1) chuck more pixels on the same size sensor, add some gizmos, like video, make it more plasticy, bump up the price and hay presto! 6/10
Fuji S2 – Another landmark wedding camera, mainly as there was not anything else about at the time but it was really good, you could still use it today and get great results! 6/10
Leica S2 – Although I have not shot a wedding using this camera I have taken one for a test drive, its pretty quick to use, simply the best viewfinder you will ever look though, HUGE files, but overkill for a wedding and high ISO poor, M9 files almost as good! 6/10
So to sum up, 2x Leica M9′s and a few “nice ” Leica lenses and you have the perfect wedding set up, however if you are new to rangefinders then practise for a year first and if you usually shoot 1000 plus frames per wedding, stick to your 5D mk2
Lens wise I use 28mm, 50 (Noc) and 90 all I need. The Leica lovers will swoon at the Noctilux but its only the f/1 version not the new f0.95 ….yet ;>P
If I have any more interest about shooting a wedding using a Leica M9 then I am going to do a one day course for interested parties, there is quite a bit to learn, but get it right and its worth it!